if men had to do it…it wouldn’t be being done

If men had to do it

Lately this photo has been circling around social networks. As nice looking as these men are, it could be assumed they’re holding these postures only because they’re comedians; the photo’s amusing and something comedians would do for laughs. But because Carell, Stewart and Colbert are politically minded, they’re illuminating and mocking how women are arranged, twisted and bent to sell things. This photo’s entitled: If Men Had to Do It.

What’s “IT”?

IT is this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

http://www.realbeer.com/blog/images/20060314-stpauli.jpg

And even more disturbing, this:

http://www.mimifroufrou.com/scentedsalamander/images/Dolce-Gabbana-Ad-Sexist.jpg

In most ads, women pose in half-naked, stilted and misshapened positions for others—i.e. men—to eyeball while the male models are usually accomplishing something, are mostly clothed, engaged in an activity, “taking charge” (maybe like the dick above) or working.

Women instead, introspectively gaze off in the distance with almost exposed breasts, maybe unzipped jeans and are often dreamily reclined and arched about on a bed, divan or floor like throw pillows waiting for someone to use them. Or turned into items like the ‘woman-as-beer’ pic above. Urgent alert: women are actually human (see: women aren’t food); we do things, too.

Secondly, females are dismembered components: lips, legs, breasts, butts or headless trunks in a delusional torso type only representative of 3-5% of the female population: non-existent  hips, ample and often artificial breasts, long computer enhanced legs and hairless bodies (see: i like a woman who takes “care” of herself) measured in ounces instead of pounds. Barely joking on that last one.

This faux female image has become the ridiculous ideal for adolescent girls whose brains are just emerging out of the chief childhood Theta brainwave state and aren’t yet capable of decent discernment. That “womanly” depiction lingers long into adulthood primarily because 97% of all media we see is male driven creating this kind of dysfunction: 75% of normal-weight women feel they are overweight, while 80% of 4th graders have done fad diets. See: ‘weighty’ women & “little petty places.”

If we want female reality displayed, we’ll need more gender balance in all aspects and channels of media.

Sometimes, in order to see what’s so ubiquitous and so obvious that IT becomes invisible, we’ll need to reverse IT, like the comics above did.

Next time you leaf through a magazine, watch a beer commercial, view a mannequin, check out a movie, see a billboard, play a video game, and the image of a woman is shown—in whatever distorted or partially clothed state—mentally replace that woman with a male figure.

Go ahead, take your time. What do you see? Sophomoric male fantasies exposed? Women as busty perfumed chattel? Absurdly embarrassing isn’t IT?

For more detailed information see The Gender Ads Project.

UPDATE: Just found this Canadian school project. A short illuminating film. At 2:50, you get to see this gender role reversal played out extremely well: Representation of Gender in Advertising.

UPDATE 2: Men on motorcycles—ooo la la

11 thoughts on “if men had to do it…it wouldn’t be being done

  1. Very powerful video and article. Both the real advertisements and roll reversal ones made me uncomfortable.

    Like

    • Agreed. I always feel somewhat queasy seeing women in all the sick poses and it’s no better with men.

      Like

  2. “Urgent alert: women are actually human (see: women aren’t food); we *do* things, too.”

    And think and feel!

    Like

  3. Are you saying the women in these ads were being forced to pose at gunpoint? Otherwise it’s misleading to say they “had” to do it.

    Like

    • I never said these women “had” to do it. The title of the photo with Stewart et al was entitled, “If Men Had to Do It.” The point it appears you may be deliberately skipping over is that men are never asked to humiliate themselves this way in advertising.

      Like

      • Who decides what’s humiliating? If the girls in the ads had felt that it was, they could have said no. I know I’d rather pose in underwear on a billboard than participate in a quiz show on TV, for example.

        Like

  4. Since most if not all men don’t/won’t do these ads, apparently they find these types of degrading poses and pathetic attire humiliating. Send me a picture when you decide to pose.

    Like

    • Please provide research data proving that men refuse to do this (as opposed to just not being offered the chance, because nobody cares to see them on billboards in the first place). Otherwise you’re just baselessly hatemongering.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.